You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accelerated discovery of stable lead-free hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites via machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-05761-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuaihua Lu, Qionghua Zhou, Yixin Ouyang, Yilv Guo, Qiang Li, Jinlan Wang |
| Abstract |
Rapidly discovering functional materials remains an open challenge because the traditional trial-and-error methods are usually inefficient especially when thousands of candidates are treated. Here, we develop a target-driven method to predict undiscovered hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) for photovoltaics. This strategy, combining machine learning techniques and density functional theory calculations, aims to quickly screen the HOIPs based on bandgap and solve the problems of toxicity and poor environmental stability in HOIPs. Successfully, six orthorhombic lead-free HOIPs with proper bandgap for solar cells and room temperature thermal stability are screened out from 5158 unexplored HOIPs and two of them stand out with direct bandgaps in the visible region and excellent environmental stability. Essentially, a close structure-property relationship mapping the HOIPs bandgap is established. Our method can achieve high accuracy in a flash and be applicable to a broad class of functional material design. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 456 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 17% |
| Researcher | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 165 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 80 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 53 | 12% |
| Engineering | 40 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 32 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 12% |
| Unknown | 186 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,679,907
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,277
of 49,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,174
of 335,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#649
of 1,419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.