You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GWAS of lifetime cannabis use reveals new risk loci, genetic overlap with psychiatric traits, and a causal effect of schizophrenia liability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-018-0206-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joëlle A. Pasman, Karin J. H. Verweij, Zachary Gerring, Sven Stringer, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Jorien L. Treur, Abdel Abdellaoui, Michel G. Nivard, Bart M. L. Baselmans, Jue-Sheng Ong, Hill F. Ip, Matthijs D. van der Zee, Meike Bartels, Felix R. Day, Pierre Fontanillas, Sarah L. Elson, the 23andMe Research Team, Harriet de Wit, Lea K. Davis, James MacKillop, The Substance Use Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, International Cannabis Consortium, Jaime L. Derringer, Susan J. T. Branje, Catharina A. Hartman, Andrew C. Heath, Pol A. C. van Lier, Pamela A. F. Madden, Reedik Mägi, Wim Meeus, Grant W. Montgomery, A. J. Oldehinkel, Zdenka Pausova, Josep A. Ramos-Quiroga, Tomas Paus, Marta Ribases, Jaakko Kaprio, Marco P. M. Boks, Jordana T. Bell, Tim D. Spector, Joel Gelernter, Dorret I. Boomsma, Nicholas G. Martin, Stuart MacGregor, John R. B. Perry, Abraham A. Palmer, Danielle Posthuma, Marcus R. Munafò, Nathan A. Gillespie, Eske M. Derks, Jacqueline M. Vink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 431 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 66 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 8% |
| Canada | 20 | 5% |
| Germany | 18 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Chile | 6 | 1% |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 10% |
| Unknown | 212 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 318 | 74% |
| Scientists | 75 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 455 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 16% |
| Researcher | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 9% |
| Professor | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 15% |
| Unknown | 138 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 66 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 45 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 165 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 737. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#27,676
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#42
of 5,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#513
of 345,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.