↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic significance of the programmed death ligand 1 expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and correlation with the tumor microenvironment and hypoxia-inducible factor expression

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic significance of the programmed death ligand 1 expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and correlation with the tumor microenvironment and hypoxia-inducible factor expression
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13000-018-0742-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayriye Tatli Dogan, Merve Kiran, Burak Bilgin, Aydan Kiliçarslan, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Bülent Yalçin, Arslan Ardiçoglu, Ali Fuat Atmaca, Berrak Gumuskaya

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal malignancy. Hypoxia-inducible factors, HIF-1α and HIF-2α, are expressed in the majority of ccRCC. Targeting immune checkpoints with the blockade of PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 reorganizes T-cell activity in tumor microenvironment and provides important antitumor responses. PD-L1 upregulation has been found to be hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) dependent. Our aim is to demonstrate the association between PD-L1 and HIF expression and to reveal the role of PD-L1 in prognosis and its association with tumor microenvironment. Surgical specimens from 145 patients diagnosed with ccRCC, who had undergone radical or partial nephrectomy, were retrospectively analyzed. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMA) was performed to demonstrate expressions of PD-L1, HIF-1α, and HIF-2α in tumor cells and PD-1, CD4, and CD8 in lymphocytes to assess lymphocyte density in tumor microenvironment. PD-L1 tumor cell expression was detected in 20/125 (13.8%) cases, which correlated with higher levels of PD-1, CD4, CD8 and HIF-2α expression. Low or high expression of HIF-1α was similar in PD-L1-positive cases. When PD-L1-positive cases were compared with negative ones, there was no significant difference in terms of prognostic factors. However, the number of WHO/ISUP grade 3-4 tumors was significantly higher in PD-L1-positive cases than in negative ones. PD-L1 tumor cell expression is strongly associated with increased HIF-2α expression and presence of dense lymphocytic infiltration in ccRCCs. Our findings confirm that PD-L1 positivity is associated with high ISUP nucleolar grade. The association between PD-L1, HIF, and lymphocyte density in tumor microenvironment must be clarified and especially taken into account in combination treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#1,007
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,224
of 342,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.