↓ Skip to main content

Review of the tactical evaluation tools for youth players, assessing the tactics in team sports: football

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of the tactical evaluation tools for youth players, assessing the tactics in team sports: football
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1462-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sixto González-Víllora, Jaime Serra-Olivares, Juan Carlos Pastor-Vicedo, Israel Teoldo da Costa

Abstract

For sports assessment to be comprehensive, it must address all variables of sports development, such as psychological, social-emotional, physical and physiological, technical and tactical. Tactical assessment has been a neglected variable until the 1980s or 1990s. In the last two decades (1995-2015), the evolution of tactical assessment has grown considerably, given its importance in game performance. The aim of this paper is to compile and analyze different tactical measuring tools in team sports, particularly in soccer, through a bibliographical review. Six tools have been selected on five different criteria: (1) Instruments which assess tactics, (2) The studies have an evolution approach related to the tactical principles, (3) With a valid and reliable method, (4) The existence of publications mentioning the tool in the method, v. Applicable in different sports contexts. All six tools are structured around seven headings: introduction, objective(s), tactical principles, materials, procedures, instructions/rules of the game and published studies. In conclusion, the teaching-learning processes more tactical oriented have useful tactical assessment instrument in the literature. The selection of one or another depends some context information, like age and level of expertise of the players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 327 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Researcher 21 6%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 96 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 177 53%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 12 4%
Computer Science 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 1%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 97 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,880,013
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#274
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,052
of 297,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#24
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.