↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013105
Authors

Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann-Schmid, Christopher Maher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 35%
Unspecified 21 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,008,896
of 13,441,462 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,649
of 10,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,488
of 266,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,441,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.