↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nir Haya, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Christopher Maher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 342 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Master 44 13%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 19 6%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 141 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 156 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,604,954
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,621
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,331
of 343,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.