↓ Skip to main content

Warming of the interior Arctic Ocean linked to sea ice losses at the basin margins

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
281 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Warming of the interior Arctic Ocean linked to sea ice losses at the basin margins
Published in
Science Advances, August 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat6773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Louise Timmermans, John Toole, Richard Krishfield

Abstract

Arctic Ocean measurements reveal a near doubling of ocean heat content relative to the freezing temperature in the Beaufort Gyre halocline over the past three decades (1987-2017). This warming is linked to anomalous solar heating of surface waters in the northern Chukchi Sea, a main entryway for halocline waters to join the interior Beaufort Gyre. Summer solar heat absorption by the surface waters has increased fivefold over the same time period, chiefly because of reduced sea ice coverage. It is shown that the solar heating, considered together with subduction rates of surface water in this region, is sufficient to account for the observed halocline warming. Heat absorption at the basin margins and its subsequent accumulation in the ocean interior, therefore, have consequences for Beaufort Gyre sea ice beyond the summer season.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 281 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 49%
Environmental Science 13 10%
Engineering 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 549. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#45,056
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#579
of 12,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#879
of 345,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#14
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.