↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Impact of Perineural Invasion in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic Impact of Perineural Invasion in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00268-018-4774-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Hyun Kim, Seung‐Seop Yeom, Soo Young Lee, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim, Kyung Hwa Lee, Jae Hyuk Lee

Abstract

Perineural invasion (PNI) has emerged as an important factor related to colorectal cancer spread; however, the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on PNI remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the prognostic value of PNI, along with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), in rectal cancer patients treated with nCRT. This single-center observational study of pathologic variables, including PNI and LVI, analyzed 1411 invasive rectal cancer patients (965 and 446 patients treated with primary resection and nCRT, respectively). The overall detection rates of LVI and PNI were 16.7 and 28.8%, respectively. The incidence of LVI was significantly lower in patients treated with nCRT (8.1 vs. 20.6%, P < .001); this was confirmed by multivariate analysis. However, PNI was not affected by nCRT (with nCRT 28.3% vs. without nCRT 29.1%, P = .786). In the 446 patients with nCRT, multivariate analysis revealed that PNI was an independent prognostic factor for both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the prediction of both 5-year DFS and OS, the C-index for the combinations of T-stage with the PNI (TPNI) system showed favorable result, especially in patients with a total number of harvested lymph nodes <8. PNI is a meaningful prognostic factor for rectal cancer patients treated with nCRT, especially when <8 lymph nodes are harvested. The lack of influence of nCRT on the PNI incidence suggests that residual tumor cells with PNI are more radioresistant or biologically aggressive than those without.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Psychology 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,496,705
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,130
of 4,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,638
of 339,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.