↓ Skip to main content

REM sleep behaviour disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REM sleep behaviour disorder
Published in
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41572-018-0016-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yves Dauvilliers, Carlos H. Schenck, Ronald B. Postuma, Alex Iranzo, Pierre-Herve Luppi, Giuseppe Plazzi, Jacques Montplaisir, Bradley Boeve

Abstract

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia that is characterized by loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep (known as REM sleep without atonia, or RSWA) and abnormal behaviours occurring during REM sleep, often as dream enactments that can cause injury. RBD is categorized as either idiopathic RBD or symptomatic (also known as secondary) RBD; the latter is associated with antidepressant use or with neurological diseases, especially α-synucleinopathies (such as Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy) but also narcolepsy type 1. A clinical history of dream enactment or complex motor behaviours together with the presence of muscle activity during REM sleep confirmed by video polysomnography are mandatory for a definite RBD diagnosis. Management involves clonazepam and/or melatonin and counselling and aims to suppress unpleasant dreams and behaviours and improve bedpartner quality of life. RSWA and RBD are now recognized as manifestations of an α-synucleinopathy; most older adults with idiopathic RBD will eventually develop an overt neurodegenerative syndrome. In the future, studies will likely evaluate neuroprotective therapies in patients with idiopathic RBD to prevent or delay α-synucleinopathy-related motor and cognitive decline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 432 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Master 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 22 5%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 175 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 25%
Neuroscience 61 14%
Psychology 18 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 186 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,193,101
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#421
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,789
of 348,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.