| Title |
Malignant Transformation of Hymenolepis nana in a Human Host
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1505892 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atis Muehlenbachs, Julu Bhatnagar, Carlos A Agudelo, Alicia Hidron, Mark L Eberhard, Blaine A Mathison, Michael A Frace, Akira Ito, Maureen G Metcalfe, Dominique C Rollin, Govinda S Visvesvara, Cau D Pham, Tara L Jones, Patricia W Greer, Alejandro Vélez Hoyos, Peter D Olson, Lucy R Diazgranados, Sherif R Zaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,058 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 184 | 17% |
| Colombia | 50 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 35 | 3% |
| Mexico | 28 | 3% |
| Brazil | 27 | 3% |
| Spain | 26 | 2% |
| Canada | 20 | 2% |
| Japan | 13 | 1% |
| Australia | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 170 | 16% |
| Unknown | 493 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 771 | 73% |
| Scientists | 178 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 92 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Russia | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 432 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 94 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 33 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1600. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,114
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#377
of 32,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 297,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#4
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.