You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skeletogenic Fate of Zebrafish Cranial and Trunk Neural Crest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047394 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika Kague, Michael Gallagher, Sally Burke, Michael Parsons, Tamara Franz-Odendaal, Shannon Fisher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 22% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,970,407
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,225
of 194,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,318
of 179,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#906
of 4,729 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,729 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.