↓ Skip to main content

Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by hand‐sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by hand‐sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008688.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Probst, Felix J Hüttner, Ulla Klaiber, Phillip Knebel, Alexis Ulrich, Markus W Büchler, Markus K Diener

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 54 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 60 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,508,089
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,246
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,010
of 298,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#263
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.