You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144702 |
Authors |
Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Robert L. Pressey, Natalie C. Ban, Ken Vance-Borland, Chuck Willer, Carissa Joy Klein, Steven D. Gaines |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Fiji | 1 | 33% |
Seychelles | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 1% |
Mexico | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 4 | <1% |
Colombia | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 435 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 113 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 17% |
Student > Master | 66 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 5% |
Other | 89 | 19% |
Unknown | 55 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 170 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 30% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 2% |
Other | 32 | 7% |
Unknown | 78 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,779,186
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#426
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,250
of 248,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.