↓ Skip to main content

Early dates for ‘Neanderthal cave art’ may be wrong

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Evolution, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
100 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early dates for ‘Neanderthal cave art’ may be wrong
Published in
Journal of Human Evolution, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxime Aubert, Adam Brumm, Jillian Huntley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#295,516
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#94
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,133
of 345,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.