You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early dates for ‘Neanderthal cave art’ may be wrong
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Human Evolution, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maxime Aubert, Adam Brumm, Jillian Huntley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 14% |
United States | 10 | 10% |
Spain | 7 | 7% |
France | 6 | 6% |
Japan | 4 | 4% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 76 | 76% |
Scientists | 19 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 21 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#295,516
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#94
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,133
of 345,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.