↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-4-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary E Cosner, Linda A Raubeson, Robert K Jansen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 91 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Computer Science 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,542
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,503
of 133,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.