You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implication of lncRNAs in pathogenesis of esophageal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ott.s87856 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wei-Wei Tang, Qingquan Wu, Su-Qing Li, Yu-Suo Tong, Zi-Hao Liu, Tong-Xin Yang, Yong Xu, Xiu-Feng Cao |
Abstract |
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), transcripts as longer than 200 nt in length with a great number of varieties in human genomics, play important roles in the regulation of genetics and epigenetics including gene transcription and post-transcription. Increasing evidence have demonstrated the upregulation of lncRNAs in tumorigenesis and metastasis of esophageal cancer (EC), a type of malignant tumors particularly in Asia. In this review, we briefly discuss the profiles and functions of lncRNAs involved in the progression of EC, which may provide a new approach to improve EC diagnosis and treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,438
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,445
of 295,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#48
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.