↓ Skip to main content

Dancing for Food in the Deep Sea: Bacterial Farming by a New Species of Yeti Crab

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
21 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dancing for Food in the Deep Sea: Bacterial Farming by a New Species of Yeti Crab
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew R. Thurber, William J. Jones, Kareen Schnabel

Abstract

Vent and seep animals harness chemosynthetic energy to thrive far from the sun's energy. While symbiont-derived energy fuels many taxa, vent crustaceans have remained an enigma; these shrimps, crabs, and barnacles possess a phylogenetically distinct group of chemosynthetic bacterial epibionts, yet the role of these bacteria has remained unclear. We test whether a new species of Yeti crab, which we describe as Kiwa puravida n. sp, farms the epibiotic bacteria that it grows on its chelipeds (claws), chelipeds that the crab waves in fluid escaping from a deep-sea methane seep. Lipid and isotope analyses provide evidence that epibiotic bacteria are the crab's main food source and K. puravida n. sp. has highly-modified setae (hairs) on its 3(rd) maxilliped (a mouth appendage) which it uses to harvest these bacteria. The ε- and γ- proteobacteria that this methane-seep species farms are closely related to hydrothermal-vent decapod epibionts. We hypothesize that this species waves its arm in reducing fluid to increase the productivity of its epibionts by removing boundary layers which may otherwise limit carbon fixation. The discovery of this new species, only the second within a family described in 2005, stresses how much remains undiscovered on our continental margins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 182 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 29 15%
Other 8 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 48%
Environmental Science 27 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#415,920
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,894
of 214,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,140
of 249,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#56
of 2,820 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,820 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.