↓ Skip to main content

Technology-Based Self-Care Methods of Improving Antiretroviral Adherence: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technology-Based Self-Care Methods of Improving Antiretroviral Adherence: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parya Saberi, Mallory O. Johnson

Abstract

As HIV infection has shifted to a chronic condition, self-care practices have emerged as an important topic for HIV-positive individuals in maintaining an optimal level of health. Self-care refers to activities that patients undertake to maintain and improve health, such as strategies to achieve and maintain high levels of antiretroviral adherence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 123 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Psychology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,846,113
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,924
of 193,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,441
of 239,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#740
of 2,793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.