You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-015-0112-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryota Sato, Michitaka Nasu |
| Abstract |
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is a reversible myocardial dysfunction that typically resolves in 7-10 days. It is characterized by left ventricular dilatation and depressed ejection fraction. However, many uncertainties exist regarding the mechanisms, characteristics, and treatments of this condition. Therefore, this review attempts to summarize our current knowledge of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 23% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 57% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,284,853
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#57
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,434
of 294,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.