↓ Skip to main content

The mental health users’ movement in Argentina from the perspective of Latin American Collective Health

Overview of attention for article published in Global Public Health, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mental health users’ movement in Argentina from the perspective of Latin American Collective Health
Published in
Global Public Health, August 2018
DOI 10.1080/17441692.2018.1514063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Ardila-Gómez, Martín Agrest, Marina A. Fernández, Melina Rosales, Lucila López, Alberto Rodolfo Velzi Díaz, Santiago Javier Vivas, Guadalupe Ares Lavalle, Eduardo Basz, Pamela Scorza, Alicia Stolkiner

Abstract

The mental health users' movement is a worldwide phenomenon that seeks to resist disempowerment and marginalisation of people living with mental illness. The Latin American Collective Health movement sees the mental health users' movement as an opportunity for power redistribution and for autonomous participation. The present paper aims to analyze the users' movement in Argentina from a Collective Health perspective, by tracing the history of users' movement in the Country. A heterogeneous research team used a qualitative approach to study mental health users' associations in Argentina. The local impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the regulations of Argentina's National Mental Health Law are taken as fundamental milestones. A strong tradition of social activism in Argentina ensured that the mental health care reforms included users' involvement. However, the resulting growth of users' associations after 2006, mainly to promote their participation through institutional channels, has not been followed by a more radical power distribution. Associations dedicated to the self-advocacy include a combination of actors with different motives. Despite the need for users to form alliances with other actors to gain ground, professional power struggles and the historical disempowerment of 'patients' stand as obstacles for users' autonomous participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 22%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Global Public Health
#974
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,141
of 335,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Public Health
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.