↓ Skip to main content

The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00127-008-0350-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan J. Stein, Soraya Seedat, Debra Kaminer, Hashim Moomal, Allen Herman, John Sonnega, David R. Williams

Abstract

Legislation to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was passed soon after election of South Africa's first democratic government. Discourse around the TRC focused on the importance of bearing witness to the past, and on the healing powers of forgiveness. However, there was also a concern that individuals with TRC relevant experience would simply be re-traumatized by participation in the process. To date, there has been little empirical data for either hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 30%
Social Sciences 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Arts and Humanities 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#705,575
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#114
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,267
of 81,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.