You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of high-sugar grasses and improved manure management on the environmental footprint of milk production at the farm level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cleaner Production, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.206 |
| Authors |
Andreas D. Soteriades, Alejandra M. Gonzalez-Mejia, David Styles, Andreas Foskolos, Jon M. Moorby, James M. Gibbons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 29% |
| Ireland | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,182,609
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cleaner Production
#731
of 9,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,798
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cleaner Production
#27
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.