↓ Skip to main content

Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research
Published in
Scientometrics, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11192-005-0279-y
Authors

Steve Hanney, Iain Frame, Jonathan Grant, Martin Buxton, Tracey Young, Grant Lewison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Croatia 1 2%
Unknown 37 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 31%
Librarian 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 24%
Computer Science 7 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 10%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,425,763
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#273
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,704
of 146,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.