↓ Skip to main content

MOBAS: identification of disease-associated protein subnetworks using modularity-based scoring

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MOBAS: identification of disease-associated protein subnetworks using modularity-based scoring
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13637-015-0025-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marzieh Ayati, Sinan Erten, Mark R. Chance, Mehmet Koyutürk

Abstract

Network-based analyses are commonly used as powerful tools to interpret the findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in a functional context. In particular, identification of disease-associated functional modules, i.e., highly connected protein-protein interaction (PPI) subnetworks with high aggregate disease association, are shown to be promising in uncovering the functional relationships among genes and proteins associated with diseases. An important issue in this regard is the scoring of subnetworks by integrating two quantities: disease association of individual gene products and network connectivity among proteins. Current scoring schemes either disregard the level of connectivity and focus on the aggregate disease association of connected proteins or use a linear combination of these two quantities. However, such scoring schemes may produce arbitrarily large subnetworks which are often not statistically significant or require tuning of parameters that are used to weigh the contributions of network connectivity and disease association. Here, we propose a parameter-free scoring scheme that aims to score subnetworks by assessing the disease association of interactions between pairs of gene products. We also incorporate the statistical significance of network connectivity and disease association into the scoring function. We test the proposed scoring scheme on a GWAS dataset for two complex diseases type II diabetes (T2D) and psoriasis (PS). Our results suggest that subnetworks identified by commonly used methods may fail tests of statistical significance after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. In contrast, the proposed scoring scheme yields highly significant subnetworks, which contain biologically relevant proteins that cannot be identified by analysis of genome-wide association data alone. We also show that the proposed scoring scheme identifies subnetworks that are reproducible across different cohorts, and it can robustly recover relevant subnetworks at lower sampling rates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Researcher 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 28%
Computer Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#12
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,140
of 277,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them