↓ Skip to main content

Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010434.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon H Salicath, Emily CY Yeoh, Michael H Bennett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 25%
Unspecified 13 19%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 43%
Unspecified 16 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,010,630
of 13,533,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,012
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,340
of 263,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,533,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.