You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Persisters: Methods for Isolation and Identifying Contributing Factors-A Review.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Bacterial Persistence
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2853-8, 978-1-4939-2854-5
|
| Authors |
Rowe, Sarah E, Conlon, Brian P, Keren, Iris, Lewis, Kim, Sarah E. Rowe, Brian P. Conlon, Iris Keren, Kim Lewis, Rowe, Sarah E., Conlon, Brian P. |
| Abstract |
Persister cells are phenotypic variants surviving a lethal dose of antibiotic, sufficient to kill the bulk of an exponential phase population. In this chapter we summarize current techniques to isolate persisters and discuss limitations associated with identifying mechanisms of persister formation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,918
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,418
of 393,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#846
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.