↓ Skip to main content

Short-and long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning in STEMI patients: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-and long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning in STEMI patients: a meta-analysis
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12944-015-0151-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Gao, Junyi Luo, Fen Liu, Yingying Zheng, Bangdang Chen, Qingjie Chen, Yining Yang

Abstract

Compelling evidence from large randomized trials demonstrates the salutary effects of ischemic postconditioning on cardioprotection against ischemic/reperfusion injury. However, some studies appear negative findings. This study was designed to assess the short-and long-term effects of postconditioning (Poc) in studies including evolving ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Relevant studies were identified through an electronic literature search from the PubMed, Library of Congress, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ISI Web of Science. Studies published up to December 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Patients older than 18 years presenting within 12 h of the first STEMI and eligible for angioplasty were considered for the study. The 25 trials allocated 1136 patients to perform locational postconditioning cycles at the onset of reperfusion and 1153 patients to usual percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ischemic postconditioning demonstrated a decrease in serum cardiac enzymes creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB (P < 0.00001 and P =0.25, respectively) in the subgroup analysis based on direct stenting. Reduction in infarct size by imaging was showed during7 days after myocardial infarction (P =0.01), but not in the longterm (P = 0.08). The wall motion score index was improved in both the short term within 7 days (P = 0.009) and the long term over 6 months after receiving Poc (P = 0.02). All included studies were limited by the high risk of performance and publication bias. Ischemic postconditioning by brief interruptions of coronary blood flow at the onset of reperfusion after PCI appears to be superior to PCI alone in reducing myocardial injury and improving left ventricular function, especially in patients who have received direct stenting in PCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,296,405
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#1,203
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,206
of 252,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.