↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy for patients with anxiety disorders in primary care: cluster randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy for patients with anxiety disorders in primary care: cluster randomized trial
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenia Tello-Bernabé, Teresa Sanz-Cuesta, Isabel del Cura-González, María L de Santiago-Hernando, Montserrat Jurado-Sueiro, Mercedes Fernández-Girón, Francisca García-de Blas, Higinio Pensado-Freire, Francisco Góngora-Maldonado, María J de la Puente-Chamorro, Carmen Rodríguez-Pasamontes, Susana Martín-Iglesias

Abstract

Anxiety is a common mental health problem seen in primary care. However, its management in clinical practice varies greatly. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have the potential to reduce variations and improve the care received by patients by promoting interventions of proven benefit. However, uptake and adherence to their recommendations can be low.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 32%
Psychology 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Computer Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,152,153
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,688
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,547
of 240,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.