You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased Risk of Fragility Fractures among HIV Infected Compared to Uninfected Male Veterans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie A. Womack, Joseph L. Goulet, Cynthia Gibert, Cynthia Brandt, Chung Chou Chang, Barbara Gulanski, Liana Fraenkel, Kristin Mattocks, David Rimland, Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas, Janet Tate, Michael T. Yin, Amy C. Justice |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,706,990
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,413
of 194,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,664
of 106,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#418
of 1,285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.