↓ Skip to main content

Integrating heterogeneous genomic data to accurately identify disease subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating heterogeneous genomic data to accurately identify disease subtypes
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12920-015-0154-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xianwen Ren, Hua Fu, Qi Jin

Abstract

High-throughput biotechnologies have been widely used to characterize clinical samples from various perspectives e.g., epigenomics, genomics and transcriptomics. However, because of the heterogeneity of these technologies and their outputs, individual analysis of the various types of data is hard to create a comprehensive view of disease subtypes. Integrative methods are of pressing need. In this study, we evaluated the possible issues that hamper integrative analysis of the heterogeneous disease data types, and proposed iBFE, an effective and efficient computational method to subvert those issues from a feature extraction perspective. Strict experiments on both simulated and real datasets demonstrated that iBFE can easily overcome issues caused by scale conflicts, noise conflicts, incompleteness of patient relationships, and conflicts between patient relationships, and that iBFE can effectively combine the merits of DNA methylation, mRNA expression and microRNA (miRNA) expression datasets to accurately identify disease subtypes of significantly different prognosis. iBFE is an effective and efficient method for integrative analysis of heterogeneous genomic data to accurately identify disease subtypes. The Matlab code of iBFE is freely available from http://zhangroup.aporc.org/iBFE .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Computer Science 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,241,439
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#565
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,928
of 386,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.