↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous ultrasonographic evaluation of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty: time-dependent changes

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous ultrasonographic evaluation of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty: time-dependent changes
Published in
European Spine Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5752-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiharu Nakaya, Atsushi Nakano, Kenta Fujiwara, Takashi Fujishiro, Sachio Hayama, Toma Yano, Masashi Neo

Abstract

The first purpose of this study is to confirm whether the spinal cord and the surrounding tissues can be visualized clearly after laminoplasty using percutaneous ultrasonography. And second purpose is to evaluate the changes in the status of the spinal cord over time. Fifty patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty with suture anchors were evaluated using intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year) percutaneous ultrasonography. We classified the decompression status of the spinal cord into three grades and the pattern of the spinal cord pulsation into six categories. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for cervical myelopathy, and the recovery rate was calculated. In all cases and all periods, we could observe the status of the spinal cord using percutaneous ultrasonography after cervical laminoplasty. The decompression status of the spinal cord improved until 3 months postoperatively, and the clinical outcomes improved up to 6 months postoperatively. Although the pulsation pattern of the spinal cord varied in each individual and in each period, spinal pulsation itself was observed in all cases and all periods, except one, when an epidural hematoma caused quadriplegia and a revision surgery was needed. Decompression status and pulsation pattern of the spinal cord were not associated with clinical outcomes as far as pulsation was observed. Percutaneous ultrasonography was very useful method to evaluate the postoperative status of the spinal cord, particularly in the diagnosis of the postoperative epidural hematoma. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,510
of 4,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,125
of 336,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#55
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.