↓ Skip to main content

ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular BioSystems, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,423)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
603 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
487 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization
Published in
Molecular BioSystems, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c5mb00663e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangchuang Yu, Qing-Yu He

Abstract

Reactome is a manually curated pathway annotation database for unveiling high-order biological pathways from high-throughput data. ReactomePA is an R/Bioconductor package providing enrichment analyses, including hypergeometric test and gene set enrichment analyses. A functional analysis can be applied to the genomic coordination obtained from a sequencing experiment to analyze the functional significance of genomic loci including cis-regulatory elements and non-coding regions. Comparison among different experiments is also supported. Moreover, ReactomePA provides several visualization functions to produce highly customizable, publication-quality figures. The source code and documents of ReactomePA are freely available through Bioconductor ().

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 479 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 25%
Researcher 101 21%
Student > Master 58 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 7%
Other 55 11%
Unknown 74 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 150 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 8%
Computer Science 25 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 5%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 99 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,107,712
of 19,196,040 outputs
Outputs from Molecular BioSystems
#13
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,676
of 385,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular BioSystems
#4
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,196,040 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.