↓ Skip to main content

ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular BioSystems, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,453)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
681 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization
Published in
Molecular BioSystems, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c5mb00663e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangchuang Yu, Qing-Yu He

Abstract

Reactome is a manually curated pathway annotation database for unveiling high-order biological pathways from high-throughput data. ReactomePA is an R/Bioconductor package providing enrichment analyses, including hypergeometric test and gene set enrichment analyses. A functional analysis can be applied to the genomic coordination obtained from a sequencing experiment to analyze the functional significance of genomic loci including cis-regulatory elements and non-coding regions. Comparison among different experiments is also supported. Moreover, ReactomePA provides several visualization functions to produce highly customizable, publication-quality figures. The source code and documents of ReactomePA are freely available through Bioconductor ().

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 681 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 673 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 156 23%
Researcher 129 19%
Student > Master 73 11%
Student > Bachelor 60 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 7%
Other 76 11%
Unknown 138 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 212 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 4%
Computer Science 27 4%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 171 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,022,756
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Molecular BioSystems
#8
of 1,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,507
of 399,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular BioSystems
#2
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.