↓ Skip to main content

Classification of Surgical Complications

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3823 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification of Surgical Complications
Published in
Annals of Surgery, August 2004
DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Dindo, Nicolas Demartines, Pierre-Alain Clavien

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,823 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 3775 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 499 13%
Other 417 11%
Student > Master 377 10%
Student > Postgraduate 370 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 364 10%
Other 1002 26%
Unknown 794 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2333 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 <1%
Engineering 34 <1%
Other 216 6%
Unknown 1083 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#633,448
of 21,399,109 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#376
of 8,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,771
of 402,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#4
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,399,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.