↓ Skip to main content

Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028346
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. A. Ioannidis, Lamberto Manzoli, Corrado De Vito, Maddalena D'Addario, Paolo Villari

Abstract

Randomized evidence for vaccine immunogenicity and safety is urgently needed in the setting of pandemics with new emerging infectious agents. We carried out an observational survey to evaluate how many randomized controlled trials testing 2009 H1N1 vaccines were published among those registered, and what was the time lag from their start to publication and from their completion to publication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,951,026
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,161
of 196,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,001
of 241,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#727
of 2,755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.