↓ Skip to main content

A mobile phone application for the assessment and management of youth mental health problems in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mobile phone application for the assessment and management of youth mental health problems in primary care: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Family Practice, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie C Reid, Sylvia D Kauer, Stephen JC Hearps, Alexander HD Crooke, Angela S Khor, Lena A Sanci, George C Patton

Abstract

Over 75% of mental health problems begin in adolescence and primary care has been identified as the target setting for mental health intervention by the World Health Organisation. The mobiletype program is a mental health assessment and management mobile phone application which monitors mood, stress, coping strategies, activities, eating, sleeping, exercise patterns, and alcohol and cannabis use at least daily, and transmits this information to general practitioners (GPs) via a secure website in summary format for medical review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 355 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 18%
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 40 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 20%
Social Sciences 44 12%
Computer Science 35 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 47 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#1,208,439
of 15,922,732 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#128
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,901
of 216,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#6
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,732 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.