You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A transcriptional specialist resolved
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature16317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard J. Maraia, Keshab Rijal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Andorra | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Estonia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 44% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,247,639
of 23,652,325 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#34,403
of 92,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,209
of 390,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#722
of 1,034 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,652,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,034 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.