↓ Skip to main content

The importance of abiotic reactions for nitrous oxide production

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of abiotic reactions for nitrous oxide production
Published in
Biogeochemistry, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10533-015-0166-4
Authors

Xia Zhu-Barker, Amanda R. Cavazos, Nathaniel E. Ostrom, William R. Horwath, Jennifer B. Glass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 24%
Student > Master 35 15%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Chemical Engineering 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 81 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#927
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,363
of 399,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.