You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.170149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon M Fernando, Bram Rochwerg, Andrew J E Seely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 15 | 54% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 32% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,311,297
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,734
of 9,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,040
of 339,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#36
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.