↓ Skip to main content

Rickettsial retinitis—an Indian perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rickettsial retinitis—an Indian perspective
Published in
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12348-015-0066-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ankush Kawali, Padmamalini Mahendradas, Priya Srinivasan, Naresh Kumar Yadav, Kavitha Avadhani, Kanav Gupta, Rohit Shetty

Abstract

Though rickettsiosis is common in India, there is paucity of rickettsial retinitis (RR) reports from India. Moreover, rickettsial sub-types and their association with retinitis have not been studied. We are reporting a case series of presumed RR with their course of the disease, visual outcome, and association with rickettsial sub-type based on Weil-Felix test. This is a retrospective study of 19 eyes of 10 patients presented to a single institution. Cases diagnosed with presumed RR were identified from our database from March 2006 to October 2014 and studied retrospectively for patient's demography, clinical presentation, and treatment. Patients with history of fever, retinitis, and a positive Weil-Felix test and a negative chikungunya and dengue serology were diagnosed as presumed rickettsial uveitis. One patient was diagnosed to have epidemic typhus, and four were diagnosed to have Indian tick typhus. Nine patients had bilateral presentation. One patient had history of dog tick bite, and four patients had skin rashes. All the patients presented between 2 and 4 weeks after a fever. Retinitis on posterior pole with recent history of fever with or without skin rash and a positive Weil-Felix test may suggest a rickettsial etiology. Its ocular manifestation could be an immune response to recent systemic rickettsial infection. Indian tick typhus and epidemic typhus could be the common sub-types seen in our population. Although it has aggressive presentation, it has a good visual prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 17%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#99
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,906
of 387,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.