↓ Skip to main content

Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) – short version

Overview of attention for article published in GMS German Medical Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
307 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) – short version
Published in
GMS German Medical Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3205/000223
Pubmed ID
Authors

DAS-Taskforce 2015, Ralf Baron, Andreas Binder, Rolf Biniek, Stephan Braune, Hartmut Buerkle, Peter Dall, Sueha Demirakca, Rahel Eckardt, Verena Eggers, Ingolf Eichler, Ingo Fietze, Stephan Freys, Andreas Fründ, Lars Garten, Bernhard Gohrbandt, Irene Harth, Wolfgang Hartl, Hans-Jürgen Heppner, Johannes Horter, Ralf Huth, Uwe Janssens, Christine Jungk, Kristin Maria Kaeuper, Paul Kessler, Stefan Kleinschmidt, Matthias Kochanek, Matthias Kumpf, Andreas Meiser, Anika Mueller, Maritta Orth, Christian Putensen, Bernd Roth, Michael Schaefer, Rainhild Schaefers, Peter Schellongowski, Monika Schindler, Reinhard Schmitt, Jens Scholz, Stefan Schroeder, Gerhard Schwarzmann, Claudia Spies, Robert Stingele, Peter Tonner, Uwe Trieschmann, Michael Tryba, Frank Wappler, Christian Waydhas, Bjoern Weiss, Guido Weisshaar

Abstract

In 2010, under the guidance of the DGAI (German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) and DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine), twelve German medical societies published the "Evidence- and Consensus-based Guidelines on the Management of Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium in Intensive Care". Since then, several new studies and publications have considerably increased the body of evidence, including the new recommendations from the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) in conjunction with Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) from 2013. For this update, a major restructuring and extension of the guidelines were needed in order to cover new aspects of treatment, such as sleep and anxiety management. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated using the criteria of the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine. The body of evidence used to formulate these recommendations was reviewed and approved by representatives of 17 national societies. Three grades of recommendation were used as follows: Grade "A" (strong recommendation), Grade "B" (recommendation) and Grade "0" (open recommendation). The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence and consensus-based set of level 3 guidelines. This publication was designed for all ICU professionals, and takes into account all critically ill patient populations. It represents a guide to symptom-oriented prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium, anxiety, stress, and protocol-based analgesia, sedation, and sleep-management in intensive care medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 411 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Other 37 9%
Student > Postgraduate 36 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Other 110 27%
Unknown 99 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 17%
Psychology 13 3%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 103 25%