↓ Skip to main content

Should Genetic Testing for Variants Associated with Influenza Infection Be Mandatory for Health Care Employees?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should Genetic Testing for Variants Associated with Influenza Infection Be Mandatory for Health Care Employees?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2018
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2018.819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Huckaby Lewis

Abstract

Scientists are beginning to understand more about the role of host genetics in individuals' responses to influenza virus exposure. This fictional case addresses a situation in which a health care organization proposes requiring all health care practitioners with direct patient care responsibilities to undergo mandatory genetic testing for genetic variants used to (1) predict individuals' responses to the influenza vaccine, (2) determine individual susceptibility to influenza infection, and (3) identify individuals at increased risk for severe disease. This commentary will discuss ethical and legal issues associated with use of genetic test results to determine employee work assignments during an influenza pandemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%