↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003630.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khurram Ayub, John Slavin, Regina Imada

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
India 1 2%
Belarus 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Other 16 33%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 86%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,015,193
of 13,465,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,039
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,755
of 264,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,465,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.