↓ Skip to main content

Evolution and Selection in Yeast Promoters: Analyzing the Combined Effect of Diverse Transcription Factor Binding Sites

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution and Selection in Yeast Promoters: Analyzing the Combined Effect of Diverse Transcription Factor Binding Sites
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Raijman, Ron Shamir, Amos Tanay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 9%
Spain 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 30%
Researcher 24 28%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Computer Science 8 9%
Mathematics 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,637
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,490
of 168,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.