↓ Skip to main content

Elusive sources of variability of dystrophin rescue by exon skipping

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 376)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elusive sources of variability of dystrophin rescue by exon skipping
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13395-015-0070-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Candida Vila, Margaret Benny Klimek, James S. Novak, Sree Rayavarapu, Kitipong Uaesoontrachoon, Jessica F. Boehler, Alyson A. Fiorillo, Marshall W. Hogarth, Aiping Zhang, Conner Shaughnessy, Heather Gordish-Dressman, Umar Burki, Volker Straub, Qi Long Lu, Terence A. Partridge, Kristy J. Brown, Yetrib Hathout, John van den Anker, Eric P. Hoffman, Kanneboyina Nagaraju

Abstract

Systemic delivery of anti-sense oligonucleotides to Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients to induce de novo dystrophin protein expression in muscle (exon skipping) is a promising therapy. Treatment with Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMO) lead to shorter de novo dystrophin protein in both animal models and DMD boys who otherwise lack dystrophin; however, restoration of dystrophin has been observed to be highly variable. Understanding the factors causing highly variable induction of dystrophin expression in pre-clinical models would likely lead to more effective means of exon skipping in both pre-clinical studies and human clinical trials. In the present study, we investigated possible factors that might lead to the variable success of exon skipping using morpholino drugs in the mdx mouse model. We tested whether specific muscle groups or fiber types showed better success than others and also correlated residual PMO concentration in muscle with the amount of de novo dystrophin protein 1 month after a single high-dose morpholino injection (800 mg/kg). We compared the results from six muscle groups using three different methods of dystrophin quantification: immunostaining, immunoblotting, and mass spectrometry assays. The triceps muscle showed the greatest degree of rescue (average 38±28 % by immunostaining). All three dystrophin detection methods were generally concordant for all muscles. We show that dystrophin rescue occurs in a sporadic patchy pattern with high geographic variability across muscle sections. We did not find a correlation between residual morpholino drug in muscle tissue and the degree of dystrophin expression. While we found some evidence of muscle group enhancement and successful rescue, our data also suggest that other yet-undefined factors may underlie the observed variability in the success of exon skipping. Our study highlights the challenges associated with quantifying dystrophin in clinical trials where a single small muscle biopsy is taken from a DMD patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,665,381
of 24,330,613 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#30
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,554
of 396,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,330,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them