↓ Skip to main content

Efectividad de un programa de juego basado en realidad virtual para la mejora cognitiva en la esquizofrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efectividad de un programa de juego basado en realidad virtual para la mejora cognitiva en la esquizofrenia
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga López-Martín, Antonio Segura Fragoso, Marta Rodríguez Hernández, Iris Dimbwadyo Terrer, Begoña Polonio-López

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of a programme based on a virtual reality game to improve cognitive domains in patients with schizophrenia. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 40 patients with schizophrenia, 20 in the experimental group and 20 in the control group. The experimental group received 10 sessions with Nintendo Wii(®) for 5 weeks, 50minutes/session, 2 days/week in addition to conventional treatment. The control group received conventional treatment only. Statistically significant differences in the T-Score were found in 5 of the 6 cognitive domains assessed: processing speed (F=12.04, p=0.001), attention/vigilance (F=12.75, p=0.001), working memory (F=18.86, p <0.01), verbal learning (F=7.6, p=0.009), visual learning (F=3.6, p=0.064), and reasoning and problem solving (F=11.08, p=0.002). Participation in virtual reality interventions aimed at cognitive training have great potential for significant gains in different cognitive domains assessed in patients with schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Engineering 13 8%
Computer Science 11 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,460,523
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#33
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,630
of 313,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.