You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
More Knowledge Is Better: Cross-Modality Volume Completion and 3D+2D Segmentation for Intracardiac Echocardiography Contouring
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 60 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2018
|
Published in |
arXiv, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_60 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-000933-5, 978-3-03-000934-2
|
Authors |
Haofu Liao, Yucheng Tang, Gareth Funka-Lea, Jiebo Luo, Shaohua Kevin Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 16 | 38% |
Engineering | 7 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,336,402
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#260,448
of 966,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,790
of 312,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#7,807
of 23,966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23,966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.