You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Initial report of the osteogenesis imperfecta adult natural history initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-015-0362-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura L. Tosi, Matthew E. Oetgen, Marianne K. Floor, Mary Beth Huber, Ann M. Kennelly, Robert J. McCarter, Melanie F. Rak, Barbara J. Simmonds, Melissa D. Simpson, Carole A. Tucker, Fergus E. McKiernan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Psychology | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,567,637
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,058
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,647
of 295,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.