↓ Skip to main content

An Evolutionary-Network Model Reveals Stratified Interactions in the V3 Loop of the HIV-1 Envelope

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evolutionary-Network Model Reveals Stratified Interactions in the V3 Loop of the HIV-1 Envelope
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Art F. Y Poon, Fraser I Lewis, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, Simon D. W Frost

Abstract

The third variable loop (V3) of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope is a principal determinant of antibody neutralization and progression to AIDS. Although it is undoubtedly an important target for vaccine research, extensive genetic variation in V3 remains an obstacle to the development of an effective vaccine. Comparative methods that exploit the abundance of sequence data can detect interactions between residues of rapidly evolving proteins such as the HIV-1 envelope, revealing biological constraints on their variability. However, previous studies have relied implicitly on two biologically unrealistic assumptions: (1) that founder effects in the evolutionary history of the sequences can be ignored, and; (2) that statistical associations between residues occur exclusively in pairs. We show that comparative methods that neglect the evolutionary history of extant sequences are susceptible to a high rate of false positives (20%-40%). Therefore, we propose a new method to detect interactions that relaxes both of these assumptions. First, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of extant sequences by maximum likelihood, shifting focus from extant sequence variation to the underlying substitution events. Second, we analyze the joint distribution of substitution events among positions in the sequence as a Bayesian graphical model, in which each branch in the phylogeny is a unit of observation. We perform extensive validation of our models using both simulations and a control case of known interactions in HIV-1 protease, and apply this method to detect interactions within V3 from a sample of 1,154 HIV-1 envelope sequences. Our method greatly reduces the number of false positives due to founder effects, while capturing several higher-order interactions among V3 residues. By mapping these interactions to a structural model of the V3 loop, we find that the loop is stratified into distinct evolutionary clusters. We extend our model to detect interactions between the V3 and C4 domains of the HIV-1 envelope, and account for the uncertainty in mapping substitutions to the tree with a parametric bootstrap.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 104 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 49%
Computer Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,639
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,031
of 165,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#22
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.