↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients’ records

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients’ records
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marije A van Melle, Dorien L M Zwart, Judith M Poldervaart, Otto Jan Verkerk, Maaike Langelaan, Henk F van Stel, Niek J de Wit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Unspecified 4 22%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 22%
Unspecified 3 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,784,493
of 13,514,418 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,110
of 11,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,776
of 264,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#334
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,418 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.