↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients’ records

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients’ records
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marije A van Melle, Dorien L M Zwart, Judith M Poldervaart, Otto Jan Verkerk, Maaike Langelaan, Henk F van Stel, Niek J de Wit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 26 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,425,183
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,813
of 22,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,210
of 330,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#383
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.