↓ Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of Salinicoccus halodurans H3B36, isolated from the Qaidam Basin in China

Overview of attention for article published in Standards in Genomic Sciences, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete genome sequence of Salinicoccus halodurans H3B36, isolated from the Qaidam Basin in China
Published in
Standards in Genomic Sciences, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40793-015-0108-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Jiang, Yanfen Xue, Yanhe Ma

Abstract

Salinicoccus halodurans H3B36 is a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a sediment sample of Qaidam Basin at 3.2 m vertical depth. Strain H3B36 accumulate N (α)-acetyl-α-lysine as compatible solute against salinity and heat stresses and may have potential applications in industrial biotechnology. In this study, we sequenced the genome of strain H3B36 using single molecule, real-time sequencing technology on a PacBio RS II instrument. The complete genome of strain H3B36 was 2,778,379 bp and contained 2,853 protein-coding genes, 12 rRNA genes, and 61 tRNA genes with 58 tandem repeats, six minisatellite DNA sequences, 11 genome islands, and no CRISPR repeat region. Further analysis of epigenetic modifications revealed the presence of 11,000 m4C-type modified bases, 7,545 m6A-type modified bases, and 89,064 other modified bases. The data on the genome of this strain may provide an insight into the metabolism of N (α)-acetyl-α-lysine.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Engineering 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,675,950
of 6,647,401 outputs
Outputs from Standards in Genomic Sciences
#200
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,714
of 278,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Standards in Genomic Sciences
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,647,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.