↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Individual T Cell Receptors of Optimal Avidity for Tumor Antigens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Individual T Cell Receptors of Optimal Avidity for Tumor Antigens
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hebeisen, Mathilde Allard, Philippe O. Gannon, Julien Schmidt, Daniel E. Speiser, Nathalie Rufer

Abstract

Cytotoxic T cells recognize, via their T cell receptors (TCRs), small antigenic peptides presented by the major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells and infected or malignant cells. The efficiency of T cell triggering critically depends on TCR binding to cognate pMHC, i.e., the TCR-pMHC structural avidity. The binding and kinetic attributes of this interaction are key parameters for protective T cell-mediated immunity, with stronger TCR-pMHC interactions conferring superior T cell activation and responsiveness than weaker ones. However, high-avidity TCRs are not always available, particularly among self/tumor antigen-specific T cells, most of which are eliminated by central and peripheral deletion mechanisms. Consequently, systematic assessment of T cell avidity can greatly help distinguishing protective from non-protective T cells. Here, we review novel strategies to assess TCR-pMHC interaction kinetics, enabling the identification of the functionally most-relevant T cells. We also discuss the significance of these technologies in determining which cells within a naturally occurring polyclonal tumor-specific T cell response would offer the best clinical benefit for use in adoptive therapies, with or without T cell engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#21,110,894
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,353
of 32,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,604
of 394,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#106
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.